点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
两岸夫妻南京开咖啡小馆：“浓浓人情味是本店主打”******
中新网南京12月16日电 题：两岸夫妻南京开咖啡小馆：“浓浓人情味是本店主打”
中新网记者 朱晓颖
天色渐暗，城市里人车汇集，楼宇中灯火点亮。在南京闹市区珠江路商业综合体一角，西安小伙张可和台湾姑娘黄匀柔“高雄Hi～Five亥午”咖啡新店飘出咖啡香。
“欢迎光临，想喝点什么？有热乎乎的台湾冬瓜拿铁哦……”黄匀柔轻声细语，询问着到店顾客。
店里，名叫“糖糖”的宠物犬摇尾巴“求撸”，暖色系灯光照射在琳琅满目的蛋糕上。黄匀柔一边制作咖啡，一边熟练地为顾客打包甜品。
“我们店除了卖咖啡、甜品，‘主打’浓浓的人情味，客人们可以随时来唠嗑、拉家常。”张可向中新网记者介绍。
这对年轻的两岸夫妻，在南京结缘、成家、定居，如今开出的夫妻店已是第二个店面。
咖啡店里的微型手办。 朱晓颖 摄黄匀柔是台湾高雄人。过去，她的父母在大陆投资经商。她在南京上完小学、初中后，到台湾读高中、大学。大学英语专业毕业后，她回到南京，曾在一家培训机构做英语老师。
张可是陕西西安人，从南京东南大学生物医学工程系毕业后，留学法国。回到南京后，曾在一家医疗公司短暂做过医疗仪器开发的工作，后在一家外企担任工程师职务。
两个人的结识是由于黄匀柔母亲的一次偶遇。“小柔的妈妈偶然碰到我，觉得我不错，问我第二天有没有时间和她姑娘见个面、喝咖啡，但我那天和别人约好去踢球，但最后也没去踢球。”张可耿直的言语让人忍俊不禁。
经过黄匀柔母亲撮合，两人渐渐熟悉起来，互生好感。2017年，两人喜结连理，步入婚姻的殿堂。
“理工男和文科女的搭配，过日子不累。”对此黄匀柔有切身体会。做英语老师那段时间，教育工作事项繁杂，需要付出耐心和细心，精神压力比较大。对此张可发挥自身优势，条分缕析，给出有效建议。
甜蜜的小两口在2019年突遇变故，张可身患重病。黄匀柔清晰记得，张可突发疾病的当晚是个周六。她刚刚进入教室准备上课，就接到张可朋友打来的电话，赶到医院得知，爱人突发脑溢血，于是紧急手术。
那段时间，黄匀柔在医院日夜看护。为更好贴身照顾丈夫，她辞去工作，协助丈夫走上康复之路。“在康复机构的日子确实难捱，但他很坚强，主动配合康复训练，反倒给我们很大的精神动力。”
在此期间，为给丈夫制作健康饮食，黄匀柔重拾了曾经系统学习的烹饪、烘培技能。
张可的情况日益好转，黄匀柔的烘焙技能也日益见长，干脆，二人开了咖啡店。“做老师时我的英文昵称叫‘CAKE’(蛋糕)，没想到最后真的在做CAKE。”黄匀柔笑着说。
咖啡店起名“高雄Hi～Five亥午”是张可的主意。“‘亥’‘午’是取我们两个人的生肖，‘Hi～Five’也是合拍之意”。
户外气温已降至零下。天气寒冷，进店买咖啡、甜品的客人络绎不绝。人们哈着气走进咖啡小馆，端着暖暖的咖啡满意而去。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)